I would say at max 15 minutes, because all they needed was a picture.
Hey, there's such things as retakes, mistakes, and from what I know, adult women take forever to be satisfied with a picture/
Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:02 AM
I would say at max 15 minutes, because all they needed was a picture.
Hey, there's such things as retakes, mistakes, and from what I know, adult women take forever to be satisfied with a picture/
Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:04 AM
Hey, there's such things as retakes, mistakes, and from what I know, adult women take forever to be satisfied with a picture/
I'm aware that there are retakes and mistakes.... however that last part is a little offensive to me
Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:07 AM
I'm aware that there are retakes and mistakes.... however that last part is a little offensive to me
Sorry, it's just what I've fund. My mom, and aunts are never satisfied with any pictures in the first seven takes.
Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:08 AM
Sorry, it's just what I've fund. My mom, and aunts are never satisfied with any pictures in the first seven takes.
Oh, I thought you were directing to ALLLLL women, and that seemed offensive, but me I just take a picture and be done............ my mom on the other hand ![]()
Edited by Horse Rider, 29 September 2015 - 05:09 AM.
Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:47 AM
Is that real? It looks like something someone would make to get a reaction out of people.
Posted 29 September 2015 - 12:43 PM
Is that real? It looks like something someone would make to get a reaction out of people.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go back and read the comments before posting...................
Posted 29 September 2015 - 02:26 PM
Posted 29 September 2015 - 02:39 PM
Rather than lock it, why doesn't the author of the thread just edit the first post to add the additional information?
Posted 29 September 2015 - 09:41 PM
Rather than lock it, why doesn't the author of the thread just edit the first post to add the additional information?
^^ Yeah they should. ![]()
Wow! I would freak if it was real! PHEW! xD
Posted 30 September 2015 - 01:07 AM
Is that real? It looks like something someone would make to get a reaction out of people.
Yes, that's exactly what they wanted, a reaction. Most people would be infuriated by something as ridiculous as this, which is I guess the whole point of it. Many people forget that many of their everyday objects (Such as leather) were, in fact, animals. Displaying the animals alive as clothing/jewelry items is (IMO) an interesting way to get the point across. Definitely sends a good message. ![]()
(Also, no, it's not real, thank goodness!
The hamster got lots of treats afterwards too.)
Edited by Jinxhammy, 30 September 2015 - 01:08 AM.
Posted 01 October 2015 - 09:06 AM
People! Read the explanation! Jeez! *looks at past posts and realizes that she made the same mistake*
Posted 06 October 2015 - 08:58 AM
wearing animals as fashion (ect.) is horrible!
I don't think it's just "okay" to slaughter a poor animal to make a hand bag! (this makes is so mad)
Posted 06 October 2015 - 12:05 PM
wearing animals as fashion (ect.) is horrible!
I don't think it's just "okay" to slaughter a poor animal to make a hand bag! (this makes is so mad)
PLEASE! Go through and read the others posts before commenting, there IS an explanation, and if you read through the posts, then you would know.
Posted 06 October 2015 - 09:46 PM
PLEASE! Go through and read the others posts before commenting, there IS an explanation, and if you read through the posts, then you would know.
Posted 06 October 2015 - 11:13 PM
I see now. Very very sorry.
It's okay, there were at LEAST ten other people who made the EXACT same mistake as you
(and yes, it was on this post)